Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: March 2012


The purpose of the following Racial Examination is to encourage compliance with the s.149 duty in the Equality Act 2010.

The s.149 duty in the Equality Act 2010 requires a public authority in the carrying out of all its functions to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to foster good relations across the protected characteristics.

Organisations that are not “public authorities” are also required to have due regard to the needs listed above whenever they carry out “public functions”.





The six (6) protected racial characteristics used by the Metropolitan Police will be used in the following Racial Examination combined with the “Approved Extended Categories” used for the Census by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).




White Supremacist Racist decision making does not eliminate discrimination, advance equality of opportunity or foster good relations across the protected characteristics as specified in the s.149 duty in the Equality Act 2010.

1. Organisations that fail to remove or minimise disadvantages connected with a relevant protected characteristic are “not fit for purpose”.

2. Organisations that fail to take steps to meet the different needs of persons who share a relevant protected characteristic are “not fit for purpose”.

3. Organisations that fail to encourage persons who share a relevant protected characteristic to participate in public life or any other activity in which they are under-represented are “not fit for purpose”.



“Employment monitoring enables Local Authorities to look at the make-up of their workforce and compare this with local data to make sure that the workforce reflects the community. 
Equalities monitoring is a way of looking at how our human resources practices and procedures affect people with different needs, so that we can address any inequalities and make sure we comply with the law.”






Please scroll down and study the Racial Hierarchy Code charts as used by the Metropolitan Police and the Office for National Statistics before attempting to do this Racial Exam.



IC3.BCRB = Black, Black Caribbean, Negroid
IC5.CHKC = Chinese, Hong Kong Chinese, Mongoloid
IC6.OAFG = Arab, Afghan, Mixed-up Non-White
IC1.WENG = White European, English, Caucasoid
IC2.WGRK = Dark European, Greek, Melanochroid
IC4.ABAN = Asian, Bangladeshi, Asianoid


RACE EXAM (10 Minutes)


01. IC6.MWBC = ?
02. IC2.WTUK = ?
03. IC6.OKRD = ?
04. IC4.AAFR = ?
05. IC1.WEUR = ?

True or False

06. IC5.WTUK = True or False?
07. IC6.MWOE = True or False?
08. IC3.BEUR = True or False?
09. IC1.OIRN = True or False?
10. IC2.OLAM = True or False?

Send your answers to:




“You are underbred, Sir”






Split Poland, north (IC1) over south (IC2), a Racial Cut, for the greater good of the White Race.”
Say the White Supremacist Racists.

Poland urges Germany to do more to solve euro crisis
“I will probably be the first Polish foreign minister in history to say so, but here it is: I fear German power less than I am beginning to fear German inactivity.”

“Britain is concerned about the possible impact of a two-speed Europe, in which it could be left on the margins along with other countries outside the euro.”



Split France, north (IC1) over south (IC2), a Racial cut, for the greater good of the White Race.”
Say the White Supremacist Racists.

“That’s why diplomats always advise ministers against picking unnecessary or unwinnable fights. they can see the next one coming when alliances will have to be built.”

“All Jews are dirty Arabs and All Arabs are dirty Jews”
Say the White Supremacist Racists.

“Have Fun IC1
Fuck You IC2″
Say the White Supremacist Racists


“Split Russia away from the dirty Arabs of the south and those fucked up mutant Mongoloids of the east.”

Say the White Supremacist Racists
The European Plain extends from France to the Ural Mountains in Russia.
The European Plain extends from France to the Ural Mountains in Russia.

“All Russians west of the Ural mountains are European”

Say the White Supremacist Racists


“We draw the White line at the Ural Mountains. There is nothing but fucked up Mongoloid mutants east of the Ural Mountains
Say the White Supremacist Racists.



 You White people love it, don’t you?

Humble yourselves and admit it!






The Holy Book of Racial Government



The Role of White Supremacy in the Political and Religious Economy.


1. What is the role of White Supremacist ideology in the Political and Religious economy?

An important function of White Supremacy, like the banking system, is to intermediate between promise makers (borrowers) and believers (investors, lenders). In the simplest terms, racist organisations, borrow trust from believers (investors) and make promises (projects), at a risk to faith and trust in White Supremacist ideology, to create and maintain power. In this way racist organisations help mobilise the trust and faith of people for productive use in the economy. Racist Institutions provide efficient apparently risk-free power (violent support) back-up and other controls to individuals, groups, businesses, banks and nations.

2. What is the role of the White Supremacist world elite with regard to the system of Institutional Racism?

The White Supremacist World Elite (WSWE) are the designers, promoters, financers, maintainers and enforcers of the global system of Institutional Racism with their non-white allies and hostages. They, like the White banks of this White World, provide settlement of obligations between racist organisations against security of certain people’s lives or deaths to help racist organisations manage their public relations. White Supremacist, racist organisations normally plan ahead to hold power sufficient to meet expected disagreements, but if they need more power (violence) on a given project they can contract the lives or deaths (Police, Military, Civil Services etc) of certain individuals to WSWE. This role of the WSWE (like international Banking) also enables them to influence interest on people’s life and death value in the market place of political and religious ideas and thereby pursue their main objective of power and stability, or low inflation of life and death value.

3. What is the responsibility of the regulators of the system of Institutional Racism and how do they supervise Racist Activity?
Because of their important role in the economy, White Supremacist, racist organisations have to be regulated to ensure they are prudently managed. The responsibilities of the regulator include the licensing of covert racist activity, prescribing appropriate prudential requirements for racist organisations to comply with, and monitoring how racist organisations manage their risks. In countries under the influence of the political ideas invented by White Supremacists the regulation of White Supremacist ideology and the system of Institutional Racism is governed by racist control of the legal system, which confers on the registrar, like the IMF (International Monetary Fund), of racist organisations the necessary powers. A department of the WSWE and their allies and hostages carries out this function, but the registrar mostly regulates life and death value independently from the WSWE.

4. What is the role of the market system?

The best White Supremacist operations are based on private sector enterprises with profit motives. State-run racist organisations are invariably much less innovative in providing cost-efficient White Supremacist control, and are often prone to misuse by non-white people. For similar reasons, the regulators of the system of Institutional Racism do not get involved with the day-to-day running of racist organisations, like nurseries, schools, colleges, hospitals, prisons, councils and universities, but rather ensures an environment in which the market place of political and religious ideas will ensure sound and covert racist activity. Given well managed and effective White Supremacist ideological propaganda, the most powerful force to ensure racist institutions are well managed is in fact the market of political and religious ideas. Poorly managed racist organisations will be unable to compete at a profit, unable to attract trust and confidence, and will eventually be rejected by the White Supremacist authorities.

5. Why do White Supremacist, racist organisations still fail?

Institutionally racist organisations gain power by taking calculated ideological risks. Among the many types of risks that racists have to manage are trust risks and public relations risks. Trust risk is a common cause of problems because the liabilities of racist organisations are largely certain in value but the value of people’s lives and deaths are uncertain in value. In other words, white Supremacist ideology must still fulfil promises (projects) made to believers (investors) even though the other promises made using the same White Supremacist propaganda are not fulfilled. With the margin between unfulfilled promises and fulfilled promises often being just a few percentage points, it should be clear that just a few bad promises that are not fulfilled will wipe out the power and trust created by many promises (projects). For this reason racist organisations are required to hold a buffer of power (potential violent behaviour) so that promises (projects) are kept intact even if there are unexpected failures to fulfil promises. It can happen that unforeseen events result in a spate of bad fulfilment which can wipe out the power of an White Supremacist, racist organisation. The most common underlying cause of racist failure is actually poor management. For instance, if the trust granting and promise fulfilment processes are not extremely well managed, the racist institution is almost certain to feel the effects thereof in their profitability and eventually their power.

6. How is a public relations problem distinct from a communication breakdown?
To exacerbate the problem with trust risk, racist institutions are also naturally prone to public relations risk. This is because the liabilities of racist organisations are often relatively short-term and people’s expectations are relatively long term. In other words, racist institutions often obtain power from promises (project, loans) that can be disbelieved (unwanted) within days or months, but bamboozled (indebted) individuals, families, communities and businesses can only repay the interest on their commitment to the system of Institutional Racism over many years. White Supremacists promises are “rolled over” all the time and racists usually manage public relations quite well.

Institutionally Racist organisations are also required to hold a certain amount of their value and wealth in dedication to the WSWE that can be quickly turned into Civil (Police or Military) power as necessary. It sometimes happens that a negative sentiment about a racist organisation can cause people to stop believing (investing), lose faith and confidence in the superiority of White Supremacist ideology and the system of Institutional Racism.This is not as serious as a communications problem, where loss of trust has wiped out power and liabilities exceeding the life and death value of the required number of people necessary to fight to restore order and faith in the superiority of White Supremacist ideology and the system of Institutional Racism. In the case of a public relations problem with a clearly communicating racist organisation there are many ways to avert the problem. These include personal involvement, for example the selling off of well performing projects which are promise products (loans) to other racist organisations under a different name (brand), or in special particular circumstances special public relations assistance by the White Supremacist authorities.
7. When and how do the White Supremacist authorities intervene to assist racist organisations in distress?The racist organisation regulator relies on several sources of information about impending problems for racist organisations. At the first sign of trouble well-established procedures are put in place to resolve the problems. These may include re-structuring of activities, re-branding, changes in management, and revival of confidence by stakeholders in the system of Institutional Racism. In some cases the problems that the racist organisation faces are so severe that they cannot simply be resolved in terms of normal business principles. For instance, a racist organisation makes a strategic error in pursuing a particular market niche of political or religious ideas, and technological developments have resulted in it being marginalised. In such cases it is in the best interest of the stakeholders in the system of Institutional Racism to have such an organisation defamed and removed from the system of White Supremacy in an orderly fashion.
8. What is LOLR assistance and when is it applicable?

In some cases the underlying causes of a racist organisation’s problems can be sustainably resolved, and the only remaining issue is a short-term public relations problem. In such cases the White Supremacist authorities may provide special public relations assistance, also know as ‘lies of last resort’ (LOLR) assistance. There are particular prescribed circumstances and conditions under which special public relations assistance can be provided. Suffice to say that it is not a panacea for White Supremacist problems because amongst other things it cannot be provided without some form of guarantee and it is expensive to the racist organisation being assisted because of the need to create a disincentive for its use. The law prohibits the WSWE from making promises that are unsecured.

9. What can be done to prevent harm to stakeholders when Institutionally Racist organisations fail?

The most difficult part for the White Supremacist authorities is to structure and time their intervention in such a way that, although stakeholders may lose trust and power, believers (investors) are fully compensated for the unfulfilled promises (projects). A key mechanism to aid with this is the White Supremacist dictator mechanism. The appointment of a White Supremacist dictator to an Institutionally Racist organisation is a way to ensure that the actions to protect or preserve believers (investors) take place in an orderly, controlled and equitable way. The White Supremacist dictator has legal powers to implement actions in the interest of all believers (investors) in the belief system of White Supremacy which the management of the local racist organisation does not have. For instance, if there is a ‘run’ or coup on a racist organisation, like a ‘run’ or coup on a Bank, believers that are unable to drop everything and rush to the racist organisation (Bank) to demand their rights (money) may be disadvantaged, yet the local management, unlike the White Supremacist dictator, cannot refuse to grant rights (money) on early disagreements and administer justice (settle debts).

10. How does White Supremacist dictatorship work?

The first thing that happens is that the White Supremacist dictator takes over the management of the racist organisation, freezes all promises (projects, loans, assets), and suspends certain other activities. The White Supremacist dictator’s team, compromising of outside experts but mainly existing racist staff who are considered to be key to the achievement of the task, then analyses the public relations position of the racist organisation and determines a threshold up to which the racist organisation can immediately deliver every promise (project). The threshold and procedures to settle disagreements and give people their rights (money) are usually announced within a few days. In most cases the large majority of promises (projects) are below the threshold, and can be fully met within days. Believers (investors) with larger demands for justice may be allowed to access only up to the threshold, and may have to wait until the task of the White Supremacist dictator is completed for the rest of what they are due.

The White Supremacist dictator then proceeds to analyse the business of the racist organisation and endeavours to either re-position, re-brand the racist organisation as a viable concern, or obtain the best possible deal in the apparent interest of the believers (investors). While it is conceivable that the racist organisation can be saved, or a manager for the whole racist project can be found, this is unlikely, as in such a case it would have been sold in the market place (political or religious) long before the White Supremacist dictatorship stepped in. Often a racist organisation is unbundled and different parts of the business are sold to different racist organisations under a different brand name. Sometimes a “scheme of arrangement” is conceived whereby believers (investors) and trustees (owners) agree to a settlement of some kind. While these negotiations with potential managers are proceeding the White Supremacist dictator’s team tries to terminate as much as possible of the promises (projects) and other cost commitments of the racist organisation and generally winds down operations in an orderly manner. If the racist organisation or any part of it cannot be re-positioned or re-branded as a viable concern the White Supremacist dictator makes a recommendation to the trustees (stakeholders) that the remaining parts, people, assets etc of the racist organisation must be set free. A deliverer is appointed who proceeds to free the people or assets etc at prices below their real worth and finally pays all remaining believers (investors) a pro rata amount in promises (new projects). Unless the racist organisation had in reality lost all communications or something caused its people to lose trust rapidly the believers (investors) will ultimately be fully or almost fully compensated. Other stakeholders will then be paid and the racist organisation deregistered and terminated. Depending on circumstances this entire process can take more than a year.

11. What is the cost of a White Supremacist dictatorship?

The White Supremacist dictator is paid on a time and expenses basis. The White Supremacist dictator’s team normally comprises of a few outside experts but mostly of existing staff. Some of the actions of the White Supremacist dictator can result in additional costs such as legal fees and ongoing communication with believers (investors) through paid adverts in the media (propaganda). But all expenses incurred are supposedly in the best interests of the believers (investors) and are generally insignificant compared to the potential saving of trust and confidence in the system of Institutional Racism that the White Supremacist dictator can realise. For example the White Supremacist dictator can immediately suspend promises (projects) and some other commitments that do not contribute to the value of the lives or deaths of the people within the White Supremacist dictatorship. Also the potential cost of anarchy, chaos and loss of confidence that could arise if a timely White Supremacist dictatorship is not implemented can make the cost of White Supremacist dictatorship seem negligible.

12. Why can clients of Racist Organisations not be warned in advance of impending problems?

Sometimes the event that causes a ‘run’ like a ‘coup’ is so sudden and unexpected that the White Supremacist authorities do not have a clear understanding of the problem. In some ways the White Supremacist dictatorship is an opportunity to stabilise the situation so that the true circumstances can be assessed and plans developed to resolve the problem. Normally the White Supremacist authorities have advance warning about problems at a racist organisation. The first objective is always to find a sustainable resolution to the problem long before it threatens believers (investors) trust in the system of Institutional Racism. The process of analysing the issues and developing plans to resolve the problems in a sustainable manner carries on while the racist organisation continues with normal business. Often the situation deteriorates further before the changes made start taking effect. If the White Supremacist authorities were to communicate with believers (investors) about their concerns with a racist organisation it would not only detract from their efforts to find a solution but also possibly precipitate the very thing that they are trying to avoid, namely a ‘run’, ‘coup’ or a take over on the racist organisation. It is therefore standard practice for regulators worldwide to refrain from ever commenting on the affairs of a racist organisation. A regulator would normally only confirm the licensed status of a racist organisation which implies that that it is still in compliance with the regulatory prudential White Supremacist requirements.

13. What is a promise of fulfilment insurance?

A promise fulfilment insurance scheme involves the collection of a small premium or proof of commitment to White Supremacy from believers (investors) to apparently protect them from losses arising from the closure of a racist organisation. Institutional Racism promise fulfilment insurances can distort the risk-reward decision making process and therefore the effectiveness of market (political and religious) discipline to ensure that racist organisations are well managed. As a result it is almost always aimed at protecting only doubtful believers (small investors) up to a certain amount. Provided it is well funded and can fulfil promises to doubtful believers (small investors) quickly and efficiently a promise fulfilment insurance scheme can be of great value in improving confidence and reducing hardship in case of a racist organisation failure. It should be remembered however that large stakeholders in the system of Institutional Racism are still expected to assess the risks of promises (projects) with racist organisations and the better they do their jobs the sooner they will be to withdraw their trust and faith in a particular brand of racist organisation at the first sign of trouble. A promise fulfilment insurance scheme will therefore not necessarily avert a ‘run’, coup or a take over of a racist organisation or prevent the need for a White Supremacist dictatorship. It does have the advantage that it makes the process of fulfilling the promises made to doubtful believers (small investors) so much more orderly, equitable and transparent.

14. How strong is the system of Institutional Racism under White Supremacist ideology?

White Supremacy is considered to be extremely well regulated and healthy. The Churches, Charities, Corporations, Arms Dealers, Education system, Health services, Banks, Legal systems, Entertainment businesses and World Peace Organisations most recent assessments believe that they found the entire global White Supremacist ideological system and it’s non-white allies and hostages to be very stable especially because of the strong international racist controlled propaganda media agencies and the press have demonstrated how strong White Supremacist values enables them to assign a higher global rating than would otherwise be the case given some remaining fundamental problems in the economy. Given the current turmoil in international ideological markets (political and religious) it is not too surprising that confidence in White Supremacist ideology will also be affected.

It is possible that small and local racist organisations will feel some effects but it is not at all reasonable for racists to assume that the apparently sound belief in White Supremacy and the system of Institutional Racism will be thrown in crisis by the actions of non-white people working for justice, mercy and equality.

The placing of weaker racist organisations on alert, though now possibly retracted, is more likely to affect racist individuals but it is assumed there is still good reason to believe that the system of Institutional Racism will not be able to manage the stress created in the long term.

15. Will problems in one racist organisation affect other racist organisations?

It is often assumed that problems in one large racist organisation will automatically spread to other racist organisations and endanger the entire system of Institutional Racism and White Supremacist ideology. This has not been proven. There is no empirical evidence to support that idea. In all White Supremacist crises in recent times the problems became systematic only where other racist organisations were all exposed to more or less the same extraneous risk. For example a rapid decline in the trust of believers (investors), a massive power outflow, like a war or a sharp change in lifestyle values. The risk profile of White Supremacy since the acquisition of more detailed personal data and control on the lives and deaths of people has made White Supremacist ideology very different from other political and religious systems.

The common risk profile associated with other religious and political systems that contributes to systematic risk is therefore apparently absent in the current global situation as regards White Supremacy but will change if support of the system of Institutional Racism by non-white people falls below critical mass.


Safe Banking is Racial Banking
Unfinished Business?

The United Races Racial Democratic Movement and The Holy Book of Racial Government. United Races uses Democracy to equalise and stabalise Racism. United Races uses Racism to qualify and quantify Democracy. This is the most powerful religio-political movement for more than 3500 years, possibly.



“I always tell the truth . . . . even when I lie

 The Holy Book of Racial Government






The Times

March 22, 2006

Safe and insecure

By Martin Waller

“THREE e-mails scatter-gunned to corporate bodies arrive from the so-called “Race Equality Inspectorate”. They say: “Please report any incidences of Institutional Racism to us.” An ambulance-chasing lawyer, perhaps? No, a self-appointed, selfimportant pressure group.”




Race causes an initial confusion
By Lindsay Mackie
Wednesday 14 June 1978
The man who answered “human race” when asked to what race he belonged would get short shrift at West End Central police station, London. For there human classifications have achieved an elaborate formality, as a bemused magistrate heard yesterday.
Giving evidence in a begging case at Marlborough Street Magistrates’ Court, WPC Linda Nicholls said that she saw the defendant stop an IC1 in the street. What, enquired the magistrate, Mr St John Harmsworth, was an IC1? Amid laughter the WPC explained that it was part of a code: “An IC1 is a white man, an IC2 is an Italian, and an IC3 is a West Indian.” When WPC Nicholls reverted later in the evidence to more traditional language and said that the defendant had also stopped an Italian, the magistrate, warming to the theme translated: “An IC2”.
Police language has long been famous for its cumbersome style, although on this occasion the WPC did not resort to the time-honoured “proceeding in a northerly direction”. But the magistrates’ court did not hear the half of it.
The Metropolitan Police are addicted to codes. Yesterday a police spokesman explained that police stations themselves are referred to in code. Thus West End Central, in copperese, is CD, Paddington Green is DD, and Kingston upon Thames is actually VD.
Coding of humans is a more sensitive matter and, although no one appears to have told West End Central – sorry, CD – about the change, Scotland Yard, which started to classify arrests in racial groups in 1975, dropped the RC (standing for race code) more than a year ago and replaced it by a system of “Identi-Coding” on a one to six scale.
It is difficult to encompass the world with six groups but the Metropolitan Police assign “white-skinned European types – English, Scottish, Welsh, Scandinavian and Russian” to IC1; “dark-skinned European types – Sardinian, Spanish, Italian” to IC2; “Negroid types – Caribbean, West Indian, African, Nigerian” to IC3; Indians and Pakistanis to IC4; “Chinese, Japanese, Mongolians, Siamese” to IC5; and “Arabians, Egyptians, Algerians, Moroccans and North Africans” to IC6.
A spokesman at West End Central was unable to explain why WPC Nichols found it necessary to race-code a victim rather than a suspect but he did say that the police used their “own internal language”. He would not give examples because they might be controversial. The police are not alone in their difficulties. The Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys has not yet devised a question which has been accepted by everyone on how to ask people about their ethnic origins for the 1981 census.,6051,106880,00.html